War Is Popular From a Safe Distance
Humanity claims to desire peace, yet war remains one of its greatest fascinations. Why do we celebrate military victories, demand escalation, and cheer destruction when someone else must bear the consequences?
We Do Not Take Sides – We Take Notes
Covering armed conflict, strategic miscalculation, and the continued belief that this time will be different.
Humanity claims to desire peace, yet war remains one of its greatest fascinations. Why do we celebrate military victories, demand escalation, and cheer destruction when someone else must bear the consequences?
The most important shift in humanity’s relationship with power is that power has become increasingly detached from the human scale. For most of our existence, power was immediate and visible. A leader could order a raid, seize food, exile a rival, or punish a family, but the action took place among recognizable people. The powerful …
Modern diplomacy has become remarkably efficient at saying nothing while insisting it has clarified everything. Statements are issued with solemn expressions and carefully selected verbs. Actions are redefined as misunderstandings. Threats are recast as concern. Retaliation is described as restraint. When contradictions are pointed out, the explanation is delivered patiently, as though the listener has …
Efforts to de-escalate global tensions are ongoing and, by all observable measures, highly energetic. Leaders across multiple regions have reiterated their commitment to calm, restraint, and dialogue while simultaneously approving troop movements, expanding weapons deliveries, testing new systems, and clarifying—again—that none of this should be interpreted as provocative. The message has been consistent: everyone is …
Escalation ladders are not widely discussed, which is unfortunate, because nearly everyone is on one. An escalation ladder is not a dramatic object. It does not announce itself. It does not arrive labeled or fully assembled. It is constructed gradually, rung by rung, through actions described as prudent, defensive, and, above all, necessary. By the …
Strategic ambiguity has long been praised as a stabilizing force. It is credited with discouraging aggression, preventing miscalculation, and giving everyone involved just enough uncertainty to think twice. In theory, this uncertainty creates caution. In practice, it creates curiosity. The appeal is obvious. Clear commitments are binding. Clear red lines invite testing. Ambiguity, by contrast, …
Global conflict levels remain, by most official measures, manageable. This assessment is delivered with confidence, despite the steady crackle of sparks, the unmistakable smell of fuel, and the growing number of people standing very close to things they insist are not flammable. The powder keg, we are assured, remains intact. This reassurance is repeated often …